Scrib wrote:Not to interrupt your squabbling about religion (which I agree that a person doesn't have to believe in something to write about it) I think that Bright Star doesn't have to do with religion. Instead I think Keats is trying to let it through in our minds that repeatedly the Earth goes through it's stages, spring, summer, winter, fall, and even though it's the same stages over and over again, it's still beautiful and it will last much longer than any of us will.
uniqueniqueib wrote:quote="Scrib"]Not to interrupt your squabbling about religion (which I agree that a person doesn't have to believe in something to write about it)
Are you serious so you are telling me JK believes in withces and magic and everything she writes about in Harry Potter. I could write about greek mythology but that doesnt mean i believe in zeus and all the other gods and goddess.
Saturn wrote:Please... enough with trying to make put Keats was religious - its just plain wrong.]
You guys are reading your OWN religious beliefs into Keats' writings.
He I'm sure would be horrified at people tacking religious meanings to his work.
Its as ridiculous as putting Christian meaning into the work of the ancient Pagan authors, and equally erroneous.
Apollonius wrote:Saturn wrote:
I totally agree with you. Keats was contemptuous of religion and had no expectation of eternal life.
"Here lies one whose name was writ in water"
Scrib wrote:is it so wrong to thing he could be worshipping nature?...trying to refrain from the word "religion" but Keats could be considering transcendentalism* a religion...and couldn't it be all three?...immortality for his poetry which often describes nature (also immortal) which Keats worships (religion-immortal)...
Saturn wrote:He wanted immortal FAME for his work.
That's what all writers want, isn't it?
Kaki wrote:Saturn wrote:He wanted immortal FAME for his work.
That's what all writers want, isn't it?
It's interesting you say that, I would have thought most writers wanted to inspire a thought or emotion, to make a connection with the reader. Fame, that is a rather specific word... I would have thought he just wanted to live on in his work, famous or not. As long as it has been written down it will always have the potential to touch someone even long after the author has "ceased to be".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest